The rule of law in Peru after 30 years of constitutional validity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11187514Abstract
In recent years, Peru has shown a great deal of institutional fragility as a result of political confrontations, which has led to a certain politicization of justice and judicialization of politics, while generating legal insecurity that, in the long run, has repercussions on the economy and social development.
As a result of institutional fragility, critical voices have been raised about the validity of the rule of law in our country, the main point of debate and controversy being the proposal of a new Constitution through a Constituent Assembly.
In this regard, Lucas Ghersi, a young constitutional lawyer, gives us an interview to give his views on the validity or not of the rule of law in Peru, while commenting on possible solutions for institutional improvement.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 PRIUS - Journal of Law and Political Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
PRIUS applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to the articles and other works we publish. Therefore, each manuscript submitted for publication by the journal will be processed under the CC BY license. The use of this license is consistent with the open access policy of the journal, since this is the most open license considered "the gold standard" of open access. The summary of this license can be reviewed at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
